In the pages of The Spectator, feminist Julie Burchill says Munroe Bergdorf aka Ian Beaumont, a male model who identifies as a woman, looks like a mummified boy-pharaoh. Nailed it. A massive amount of surgery was used to obtain this hyperreality. The medical-industrial complex made a fuck ton of money off this dude—and my guess this isn’t the end of the transformation. See the results for yourself:
This story seems like satire, I know. It’s not. In November 2023, UN Women named Bergdorf as its first “UN Women UK Champion.” Not only is this a man, but consider the message this sends to girls: “See your plastic surgeon so you, too, can look like men who simulate women.” Google Bergdorf to see the change overtime. The message is that men do women better than women do (a message debunked by collages and videos of trans-identifying men easily found on the Internet). Bergdorf joined UN Women UK as an advocate in 2019 supporting its campaign to put a stop to female genital mutilation (FGM). That’s right, a man with genitals surgically altered to look like female genitals joined a campaign to stop female genital mutilation. I swear I’m not making this up.
Fair Play for Women, on behalf of seventeen UK activist groups, wrote a letter titled “A letter to UN Women: this male does not represent us” condemning the decision. The letter expresses concerns about appointing a male who presents in a highly sexualized stereotype of womanhood as an ambassador for women. The letter emphasizes UN Women’s stance on males becoming women, stating that the organization’s credibility is compromised. You think? The groups conveys their “dismay and disappointment” regarding Munroe Bergdorf, referred to as a “male activist,” being appointed, highlighting that the UK has over 33 million females to choose one, yet a man was chosen. It is truly bizarre. The agenda could not be clearer: the elite project to confuse our language is a global one.
The agenda is a misogynistic and homophobic one. The letter reveals Bergdorf’s past objections to women referencing female bodies, citing his forced resignation as an LGBT+ adviser to the UK Labour Party. His resignation resulted from vulgar and derogatory posts targeting white people, lesbians, and gays, including labeling “all white people” as “violent racists” and using offensive terms like “faggot” and “old poof” to respond to critics. The letter references Bergdorf’s mocking of a friend’s fertility in uncovered tweets, stating, “How’s your barren womb? We all know your little secret … hairy lesbian!” Bergdorf has in past expressed a desire to engage in “gay bashing,” targeting a character from the TV show Glee. In recent social media posts, Bergdorf endorsed Palestine, sharing an image of a sign that reads “Queers for a free Palestine.”
The queer lobby has steered UN Women in this direction for a while now. Here is a screen shot of the UN Women campaign on Twitter (now X). Take the slogan “Every woman is a woman.” As is, it has no content. But those who use the slogan know what they mean to convey, namely that men who say they are women are women. It’s a restatement of what precedes it, the propaganda slogan “Trans women are women.” This is why the construct “cis woman” was invented, so there can be two types of women: trans and cis. Of course, there is only one type of human female now that neanderthals and denisovans are extinct. But the queer project is determined to erase physical anthropology and replace it with the quasi-religious system of gender ideology.
In pursuit of the project to confuse our language, the queer lobby words things every which way but true. Ask them “What is a woman?” and they will likely answer, “Somebody who identifies as a woman.” As Matt Walsh famously rebutted, what is that? They will never answer the question. What they’re saying is this: “A square is a thing we call a square,” as if there s non-tautological definition of a square isn’t available and necessary. Here they mean to substitute sophistry for fact and reason.
Gender ideology is a mess of contradiction and circularity, the entire system is predicated on an entirely subjective construct—“gender identity”—invented by a sexologist who believed that dream telepathy was a thing. It’s crackpot through and through. Nearly, identical in form to Scientology, the only outstanding practical difference is that Scientologists take your money but leave your nutsack intact. The medical-industrial complex wants both.
freedom and reason 