The Role of Irreligious Criticism in Social Progress

While criticism of people’s race or sex is likely out of order, criticism of ideologies and proponents of those ideologies is not only fair game but very often necessary to make social progress.

Religion is an ideology. Religion is not analogous to race or sex. While one can change their race and sex, it is impossible to be raceless and sexless in a racist patriarchy. However, one can be religionless (atheist) and this is thanks to the western value of secularism, which has provided the opportunity for individuals to be emancipated from religion. The United States is the paradigm of progress in this area, actually forming as its basis a godless constitution that explicitly walls off government from religious rule. It is not time to take this for granted. We have to step up to the challenge secularism is facing from the parties of God and their apologists.

I watched Life of Brian last night. It is one of the most important films ever made. What makes it so important is that shows how absolutely absurd religious belief is. While watching it it occurred to me that an attempt to make a similar movie about the absurdity of Islam would likely be met with hate crime charges (as well as vigilante violence). As we have seen this past week, a European court upheld the conviction of a woman for talking about Muhammad’s sex life (to put it charitably).

That it is okay to mock Christianity but not Islam is an obvious double standard – and not one that I suspect is without ulterior motive. One of the ways Christians Christianized societies was to forbid criticism of Jehovah, Jesus, and the faith. It took use hundreds of years—and we’re still fighting—to get out from under that disaster. However, we are seeing the project of Islamization take a similar trajectory, with western states, nominally Christian, bizarrely taking the lead in protecting Islam from criticism and satire, and in so doing thwarting the emancipation of women, homosexuals, and free thinkers from this irrational system of regressive ideas.

Irreligious criticism and satire is neither racist nor bigoted. Stop characterizing anti-Islamic criticism as such. You are no friend of freedom and reason when you do.

Published by

Andrew Austin

Andrew Austin is on the faculty of Democracy and Justice Studies and Sociology at the University of Wisconsin—Green Bay. He has published numerous articles, essays, and reviews in books, encyclopedia, journals, and newspapers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.