Feminization and Its Discontents

In the Maddax song “Bitch,” from the 1987 Speed Demon, I do not sing that all women are bitches. I sing, “Some women are bitches.” The lyric goes, “Some women are bitches / telling me their lies / Best not fool with bitches / ’cause I ain’t got the time.” (Readers can hear the song here.)

This observation has implications not merely for personal relationships but also for the workplace and society more broadly.

Image borrowed from Yoko Ono’s webpage “Imagine Peace.”

As occupations are feminized, some women decide who’s hired, promoted, disciplined, or terminated, and how the organization functions, based on a worldview in which men are portrayed as oppressors, with women portrayed as victims deserving of special treatment for recompense. The feminized organization sees through a particular gaze and organizes work and its public face accordingly.

Men and women are different. They think and act differently. This is natural history. A feminized organization will accentuate traits common to women. And while such traits work in many areas of human endeavor (women are essential), this is not always true. And that’s okay. But since men are dismissed as oppressors, in whatever beneficial ways men may think or act, their thoughts and actions are, by definition, bad.

Hence, “toxic masculinity” and the need to feminize boys, or at least make them manageable with discipline or drugs. Masculinity is redefined as a “disorder.” Men should be more like women.

The knock-on effect is the presence of feminized men demanding to enter women’s spaces. In some places, they are allowed to, even if women object or are afraid to speak up out of fear of what will happen to them if they do. Most men are also afraid to speak up for the same reason. Many of them have also been feminized. Moreover, who wants to be a bigot? Who wants to be disciplined or dismissed?

Why are feminized men allowed to invade women’s spaces? “Kindness.” Society’s values have become feminized.

Cross-cultural psychological studies find that women score higher on measures of compassion, empathy, and prosocial behavior. They are higher on the personality dimension of “agreeableness.” Girls and women are more sociable. They are more collectivist in orientation. Men, by contrast, are more individualistic. The two orientations can only coexist if society is free and open.

To be sure, not all women are agreeable. Some women are bitches. They sit together at the mean-girls table. Their coffee mugs get shit done. Bitches use agreeableness to manipulate others. It’s an instrument of control. They demand compassion, empathy, and prosocial behavior from others to gain compliance. They wield these as weapons in a feminized context.

Another knock-on effect is a sharp decline in fertility. Nations can’t reproduce themselves. Borders are thrown open to foreigners to replenish the nation’s numbers. Why are the borders open? “Kindness.” Why the opposition to deportation? “Kindness.”

The maternal instinct to care for the future of the nation becomes transferred to the infantilized foreigner and the inner-city menace. Criminals are memorialized. Their victims’ murals are powerwashed from buildings.

Nor can the men in a feminized social order defend the nation from threats foreign and domestic. Men object to just war. Standards in the military (and policing) are lowered. Male aggression increasingly takes the form of primitive rebellion, which is channeled by globalists into societal disruption.

Are men not a danger to women? Some men are. On average, men are more likely to rape than women. Much more likely. Rapists are almost exclusively male, in fact. And that is why we don’t let them into women’s spaces.

Not all of us rape. Most of us don’t. We understand some do, and that’s why men established women-only spaces. Men know that the desire of some men to enter women’s spaces is because either they want access to women at their most vulnerable or they aren’t right in the head, in which case we don’t trust them around women (or children). Men are not as kind as women. Nature prepares men for danger.

The problem isn’t that women aren’t rational; it’s that men are. Some men are not afraid to say all this. We need more men to be unafraid.

(Note: This post is inspired by observations made by Helen Andrews. Readers can find her work here. I am also inspired by two others. Lionel Shriver and Andrew Wilson. Readers can find Shriver’s work in numerous outlets. Wilson’s work can be found here. I do not agree with everything Wilson says, but entertaining his arguments is worth one’s while. Part of pulling one’s head out of the progressive space is waking up to how progressivism, which in part views the world through the feminist gaze, distorts normal human relations. This is one of the chief elements of woke.)

Published by

Unknown's avatar

The FAR Platform

Freedom and Reason is a platform chronicling with commentary man’s walk down the path through late capitalism.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.