You may be wondering why when you type “transwoman” your device may (and this is typical) separate it in two words, rendering “trans woman.” Your device may also (typically) underline the term in red as if it is a mispelling.
You may object to the auto splitting because it suggests that transwomen constitute something like “black women,” etc.—that is, not a prefix but a modifier, as if transwomen constitute a subclass of women instead of what they are, namely men.
This is indeed the point of your device separating the term into two parts (or flagging it as a misspelling): your device is automatically substituting the rules of queer ideology for reality-based understanding.
It’s a conditioning action in which a device trains its user to write and think in a particular way—in a way the user may not wish to, indeed in a manner contrary to reality-based understanding. The objective is to entrench the habits of doublethink by changing grammar and the meanings of words. (See Neutralizing the Gender-Detection Brain Module.)
I didn’t think about this until recently, and I have been separating the words for months in several essays on Freedom and Reason. They got me.
If you think I am imaging this, and this is how I learned that they got me, the GLAAD directive makes it clear: “A woman who was assigned male at birth may use this term to describe herself. She may shorten it to trans woman. (Note: trans woman, not ‘transwoman.’) Some may prefer to simply be called women, without any modifier.” (See Glossary of Terms: Transgender.)
GLAAD is a major queer lobbying group. GLAAD and other queer lobbying organizations have colonized Big Tech and compelled them to program the systems we use in our daily lives in a way that rewires our brains.
freedom and reason 