Imagine if one of Trump’s sons screwed his other son’s widow and lied on a federal form about his compulsive crack cocaine use, all while purchasing a hand gun, speed loader, and ammunition. That’s a felony. And the widow thing (wow). Imagine there’s a laptop that has video of the son with a prostitute tooting lines and engaging in gun play. Even more than this, the laptop has information on the father. There are emails in the trash bin. There might be some incriminating items in there. Now imagine the son is on trial and the prosecution introduces the laptop into evidence. What would your Google News feed look like right now? All this is happening right now. Be honest.
Ask yourself these questions: What government agents could Trump have counted on to take possession of his son’s laptop and conceal it during the campaign? Which high ranking intelligence officials could have been deployed to assert, in an open letter, on the basis of their authority and expertise, that the laptop looks like Russian disinformation? Could Trump have depended on Facebook, Youtube, and other social media platforms censoring and deplatforming every user, including media companies, attempting to share the story? Can Trump depend on the legacy media right now to prioritize other news stories over his son’s situation? How shall the media explain why is didn’t report on the laptop when it first knew about it? Why did the social media companies censor the story? And what about those intelligence officials?
If the inverse of the last eight years doesn’t seem plausible, indeed if it seems absurd (which you know it does), then you are confirming suspicions millions of Americans have that the administrative state, the culture industry, and the mass media are all pulling in the same direction. They are working for a side. The meaning of this is significant. It means that the dominant institutions of your society that you depend on for information, and that preserve your history and enrich your culture, are not truth seeking institutions, but a myth making apparatus that serves the interests of a ruling class, obviously one Trump betrayed. Do I need to say this? The ruling class is not you.
Betraying the class he ascended to would be the last thing Biden would ever do. He became one of them because of subservience to their needs, not because he did anything of significance. The ruling class needs cheap disposable labor. The ruling class needs to sell weapons and make war. It needs mass consumption. The ruling class needs to control the dominant institutions of our society. To make sure things run smoothly, the ruling class needs obedient servants, like Biden. Those who disobey, or who do not serve, or who might serve us, are marginalized and eliminated using various techniques. There is a universe of examples. Their marginalization and elimination will be framed in terms of “justice” and “saving democracy.” That’s how to detect a ruling class.
* * *
Hunter Biden’s laptop—the original device with hard drive intact—has been entered as evidence in court by prosecutors in his Delaware trial. Remember when you were told that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation during the 2020 election? Remember how CIA chiefs and top agents signed an open letter saying just that? The FBI had possession of the laptop in later November or early December 2019.They knew they were lying. Take this in. The intelligence community, the community that is supposed to protect our democracy, misled the public to thwart democracy. Take this in, as well: this is the same time frame as the first impeachment of Trump. Remember the phone call he made to Ukraine to find out what was going on between the Biden family and the Ukraine government? Trump was suspicious. And he was right to be.
On my blog, on December 19, 2019, I published an essay titled The Conspiracy to Overthrow an American President. I wrote there, “Hunter had accepted a board seat on Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings, which gave the appearance of a political favor to Joe, who was at the time the Vice-President of the United States. Biden admitted to an audience during a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations that he threatened to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless they fired a prosecutor he did not like.” In October of 2020, I published New York Post Drops a Bombshell on the Biden Campaign, in which I discussed the suppression of a New York Post article that “reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad.” Trump was right. That was a perfect phone call.
freedom and reason 